2026-01-09 – Weekly Chemist Jobs : Remote role for cosmetic chemist—unique opportunity

Important Note: These jobs are posted in real-time and might expire. Please apply promptly.


It’s been a lively week in the chemist job market. There’s a real demand for skilled professionals, especially in quality control and formulations. On the plus side, there are a few solid remote opportunities out there, which is always a good thing for those looking to work from the comfort of their homes.


This Week’s Jobs

  • Chemist III/Sr. Chemist
    Company: BioPhase Solutions | Location: Orange County, CA
    This role is with a leading firm in Orange County, focusing on advanced chemistry projects. Perfect for those with significant experience looking to step up.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist
    Company: ECI Talent Partners | Location: Milwaukee, WI
    Looking for a formulation chemist in coatings and building materials. If you’ve got expertise in this area, it’s worth a look.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist
    Company: Onsite Personnel LLC | Location: Philadelphia, PA
    Quality control chemist role requiring at least two years of industrial experience. A great opportunity to cement your expertise.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist
    Company: Ludlum Measurement, Inc | Location: Sweetwater, TX
    Join a diverse team working on innovative projects. Ideal for those with a passion for cutting-edge chemistry.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist II
    Company: DC Enterprises | Location: Mahwah, NJ
    This position offers a chance to work with a talented network of chemists and creatives, focusing on authentic innovation.
    Apply Here

  • Organic Chemist
    Company: Chempacific Corp | Location: Baltimore, MD
    Immediate openings for organic chemists at their headquarters. If you’re ready to start now, this could be your gig.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist
    Company: Global Channel Management, Inc. | Location: Darien, CT
    This role involves developing new technologies and formulations. Perfect for those with a couple of years in the coatings or metal industry.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist
    Company: MRINetwork Jobs | Location: Raleigh, NC
    Seeking a chemist with a knack for problem-solving and innovation. A great fit for someone looking to make an impact in North Carolina.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist 2
    Company: OMIC USA Inc. | Location: Portland, OR
    For motivated analytical chemists, this role includes responsibilities in extraction and analysis. Ideal for those looking to grow in their careers.
    Apply Here

  • Chemist
    Company: Judge Direct Placement | Location: Hammond, IN
    A manufacturing company seeks a chemist to join their team. A solid opportunity in a stable industry.
    Apply Here


Work From Anywhere (100% Verified)

Remote work is more than just a trend; it’s a lifeline for many. This week, a few roles are open for those who prefer working from home, or anywhere really.

  • cosmetic chemist
    Company: Biiji Equine | Location: Huntington Beach, CA
    Help convert essential oil formulas for safe manufacturing. If you’re equipped with formulation skills, this remote role is a unique opportunity.
    Apply Here

  • Upper Midwest Account Manager - Raw Material Specialty Chemicals
    Company: MRINetwork Jobs | Location: Chicago, IL
    This is a commercial and technical selling position, perfect for those with experience in raw material specialty chemicals.
    Apply Here

  • Patent Litigation Associate VIP-3650
    Company: Vanguard-IP | Location: Washington, DC
    Perfect for those with a strong chemistry background and a knack for litigation. An exciting role for the legally inclined.
    Apply Here


See all urgent needs jobs here: See Urgent Needs Jobs
Explore remote jobs here: See Remote Jobs


Keep pushing forward and don’t hesitate to seize these opportunities. Your next career move might be just one click away.

On my last remote cosmetic chemist gig, I attached a one-page ‘stability snapshot’ with 4/8‑week pH, viscosity, and freeze–thaw plus a note on preservative challenge, and it moved me past screening fast. If you don’t have fresh data, a tight teardown of a marketed dupe with your INCI rationale can substitute, just scrub anything under NDA. QC-leaning roles also respond well to a brief CAPA example tied to a spec drift.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‌‌​​⁠‌​‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‍​‍​⁠‌‌‌​​‍‌‍⁠⁠‌‌​‍‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌⁠‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍‌⁠‍​​⁠‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Remote roles expire fast, so I send a one-page ‘scale-up cheat’ with target shear, fill temp window, and pumpability note plus a BOM with backup suppliers to keep QC and formulations aligned. @nick_ramos84 your snapshot is solid; I’d add a quick micro spec (TPC and YM limits) since this week’s posts lean heavy on quality control. If a manager wants leaner, a single line on RM lead times and MOQs usually seals it.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‍​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌‌‍‍‍‌​⁠​‌⁠‍‍‌​‌‍‌‍​‌‌​‍‌​⁠‌​‌‌​⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‌‌⁠​⁠​⁠‌‌‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve gotten quick callbacks by sharing a 60-sec screen capture walking through a tiny DoE (oil phase % x emulsifier %), the resulting rheology curve, and a note on how I’d scale to a 100-gal sweep-and-scrape — show-and-tell for grownups. If you try this, keep formulas anonymized and tie stability claims to something like ICH Q1A(R2) so reviewers know the logic: ICH Official web site : ICH. Some teams won’t open videos, so add a short “first-week plan” line in the email as a fallback.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠‍​‌​​‍‌‍‍‌‌​​‌‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‌​‌⁠​⁠‍​‌⁠‌‍‌⁠​‍​⁠​⁠‌​‍‍‌‌‌‌​⁠‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve had good results offering a 10‑minute “bench cam” on Teams where I live‑tune viscosity and pH drift on a 2 kg emulsion with a cheap Bluetooth pH pen showing real‑time numbers — proves remote workflows… +1 on “apply promptly,” but if the posting leans QC, I skip the demo and send a short OOS/CAPA example instead.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‍‌‍‍​‌‌‌⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍⁠​‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍⁠​‌⁠​‌‌​⁠⁠‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‌⁠​‌‌‌‌​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I attach a tiny “stability snapshot” with 24 h at 3000 rpm and 5‑day 45°C, plus before/after viscosity and one jar photo — it’s a stress‑test selfie for the emulsion. That’s gotten me two remote interviews lately because it signals scale‑up awareness without a long deck. @joseph_clark89 the bench cam idea is great; just anonymize anything under NDA or some managers get twitchy.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌​‌‌‌‍‌‍​⁠​⁠‌‍‌​‌‍‍​​⁠‌​‌‍‌​‌‌‌‌‌⁠‌​‌‍‌​‌⁠‌‌‌‌‍‌​‍⁠‌​⁠‌‌‌​‍​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

And for remote roles, I send a 1‑page ‘QC spec’ (pH/viscosity/odor). It’s concise; bloated tables get ignored.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‍‌​⁠‌‍‌‍‌​​‍⁠‌‌⁠​⁠‌​‌⁠‌​‍​‌⁠​⁠‌⁠​​‌​⁠​‌‍‌⁠‌​‍‌​⁠‌​​⁠‌‍​⁠​‌‌‍‍​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Quick tip I use for remote formulation gigs: include a 1‑paragraph “method handshake” that spells out measurement settings — e.g., “Brookfield LV‑3 @ 20 rpm, 25°C; pH @ 25°C, glass electrode; 48 h hydrate” — so their lab can mirror mine. That kills most “your numbers don’t match ours” loops; if they want more, I send a 60‑sec pour/rub clip, @lauras92. Small caveat: some teams dislike video, so I add a COA‑lite line with spec ranges and the shear profile by default.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠‍‌‌‍‍‌‌‌​‌‌​⁠​‌‍‍​‌​⁠​‌​‌⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠​‍‌​​⁠​⁠‌⁠‌⁠​​‌​‍⁠​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

@OP I get the best response on remote cosmetic gigs by including a one-page “batch record” with exact weights, timestamps, and lot numbers, plus a single IFRA/allergen line (e.g., Cat 5: 0.8%) so it reads release-ready. It shows QC and regulatory awareness without bloat, though I keep supplier names generic unless there’s an NDA. If you want a quick reference, IFRA’s overview helps: https://ifrafragrance.org.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌⁠‌​​⁠‍‌‌‍‌⁠‌​‍‍‌‌⁠⁠‌‌‍‌‌‍​‍‌​‌‌‌⁠‍​‌‌‍‍‌‍⁠​‌⁠‌⁠‌​‌​‌‍​⁠‌‍‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I attach a 4-week ‘stability snapshot’ (RT/45°C photos + notes), @OP; anonymize labels if NDA.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‌​‌⁠​‌‌‌‌⁠​⁠‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍​‍‌‍​‍‌‍​‍‌⁠​‌‌​​‌‌‌‍‌‌‌⁠⁠​⁠‌‍‌​‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve had better response on remote cosmetic gigs by adding a 90‑second Loom showing the “mix order + tip speed” and the moment the emulsion goes glossy — seeing shear and viscosity build in real time builds trust, @OP. If video’s a no‑go, I include one clear impeller photo with diameter and batch volume plus the target torque as a quick fallback.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‍​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‍‌‌⁠​‌‌​‍‍‌⁠‌⁠​⁠​‍‌​⁠⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‌⁠​⁠‌​‌⁠‌​‌‌‌​‌⁠‌‍‌‌‌​‌​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌